Under Moderation
I am now under moderation on the standard. That’s ok. I can work with that.
On Today’s Open Mike Anne said:
I replied:
I found it really interesting that at one point in the interview she said “I’ve left NZ politics behind me” or similar, but at another point she said “its hard to leave politics when you have been in it for so long” (or similar)
Update: My comment has been deleted. No rationale. If they are going to delete my comments may I request that the leave the sign of my comment there so all can see that I am being supressed.
I was not notified of this and no reason has been given to me.
Update 2
I’ve emailed LPrent:
From: Kiwiteen123
Date: 21 February 2010 12:32
Subject: My position
To: lprent@primary.geek.nz
Lynn, You (or one of your admins) have placed me under moderation without notifying me of the reason. I’m writing this email so we can get our position straight.
1. When was I placed under moderation?
2. Why was I placed in moderation when it was clear I was “moderating” myself with a week long break.
3. What is the point of placing me in moderation?
4. Can you confirm that a comment made by me was deleted this morning? Thanks,
Kiwiteen123
_________________________________________
If this message is not intended for you please delete it and notify me immediately; you are warned that any further use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this material by you is prohibited. _________________________________________
No reply yet.
Waynildinho said,
February 21, 2010 at 2:07 pm
There ya go, Teenster. I doubt if anybody will be sin binned for mentioning you, as you already seem to have been forgotten at the Standard.
Oh, and the irony is that you are obsessed with the Standard and yet you missed it. Or perhaps misunderstood it. Either way, you’re a goneburger.
kiwiteen123 said,
February 21, 2010 at 2:13 pm
I re-formatted your comment so it made some sense.
I count 8 mentions of me since that comment. 0 warnings towards those people.
I didn’t miss it. If you care to read my blog you’ll see at 12.47 last Sunday I had read it and made a response here.
I suggest you get over yourself and do some research.
Waynildinho said,
February 21, 2010 at 9:19 pm
Do some research? You pompous git. Why the fuck would anyone want to do your work for you? You complain about suppression and then ‘reformat my comment’. This is why you’re banned, you goose. No sense of proportion, no facts, no talent. Definately no understanding of life. Get your hand off it and get a job, then you can comment on the real world.
kiwiteen123 said,
February 21, 2010 at 9:39 pm
Perhaps you could learn to spell.
I reformatted your comment so it at least looked technically good. (It certainly wasn’t factually good)
I did not change what you had to say. I am having an open argument with one of my critics.
I am not supressing what you have to say.
A goose?! Grow up.
What does proportion have to do with it?
No facts?? I just proved your facts wrong.
No talent? Well maybe not…
Get my hand off what?
I have a job.
Are you saying people on the dpb can’t participate in discussions.
Perhaps we should ban youth from opening their mouths?
You’re comment uses stupid metaphors and is all-round awful. Fix yourself then complain about me.
Waynildinho said,
February 21, 2010 at 9:58 pm
Dude, I don’t see any spelling mistakes in my comment. Care to advise me as to where they are? You’ll still be an amateur pedant, but I’m always willing to acknowledge an error.
BTW, the comments are out of sequence. My first comment is numbered 2, my second 1.
You did not prove my facts wrong. Of the 8 mentions of you in the day or two after your banning (which you clearly did not understand given the title of this post) most were unaware of your banning and a couple of comments informed then of the fact. Now that’s one fact, not facts. So you are wrong. See how easy this pedanty game is?
Notice anyone calling for your unbanning? Even amongst the righties? Nope, because your contribution was not even rated by the trolls.
I think it rather unlikely that anyone will actually be banned for mentioning you, because, as I said, you have been forgotten.
And BTW, get your hand off it is pretty self explanatory, assuming your balls have dropped.
kiwiteen123 said,
February 21, 2010 at 10:04 pm
definitely not definatly
The reason, I believe is that for your second comment you replied to the post not to my reply to your reply… if that makes sense. No fault of mine.
I proved you wrong because you said I hadn’t noticed my “banning”. I had.
No because anyone who mentions me will get banned. I believe it what Hitler did. If you stick up for a “criminal”, you too become a “criminal”/
I obviously have not been forgotten. you obviously have bookmarked my address or remember it and decided to come and see how I was doing one week on.
Perhaps you could explain this metaphor further?
Waynildinho said,
February 21, 2010 at 10:29 pm
Look again. I wrote, ‘definately’, which is wrong, of course. You say I wrote ‘definatly’, which mispells my error. So we have both spelt a word wrong. 1 all. You then go on to make a series of grammatical and spelling errors, including a failure to use commas, fullstops, capitalisation and other linguistic markers. My favourite line is ‘I believe it what Hitler did.’ Nice iiliterate Godwinism, that.
This is your site, so any sequential problems are indeed ‘your fault’. Or do you not believe in personal responsibility?
And clearly, as the title of the post demonstrates, you were not aware you were banned. If you did know, the post would be entitled ‘Banned’, not ‘Under Moderation’.
I genuinely believe you are a teenager, KT, and I kinda hope when you do leave school and the family nest, the reality of adult life will add some colour and insight to your currently naive view of the world. At the moment you come across as a specky little herbert, with opinions of no substance, unsupported by facts or points of reference. And that is why I guess you aren’t welcome at the Standard.
Anyhoo, all the best with the struggle. I’ll leave you now to wade through all those other comments. Oh, wait. There aren’t any, are there?
kiwiteen123 said,
February 22, 2010 at 9:45 am
I accept I made spelling and grammar mistakes in my last comment. (I was replying via my phone…)
No they are not. I have a reply button for you to use, you didn’t use it. The commments went out of order. Your fault.
I knew that IrishBill said I was banned. When I commented it said I was “under moderation”, hence the title.
I thank you for your advice. Just because I disagree with you doesn’t mean I’m wrong.
Anyhoo is not a word.
Waynildinho said,
February 21, 2010 at 1:20 pm
Oh, the irony!
You run a Standard stalker site and yet you miss your own banning. It was a week or ten days ago. Permanent, as I recall. Doesn’t pay to piss Irish off, eh.
kiwiteen123 said,
February 21, 2010 at 1:53 pm
1. The comment you refer to was last Sunday.
2. It didn’t follow the normal banning practice, bold, on the banned’s comment… etc.
3. I’m not complaining about being banned.
4. IrishBill has not followed through on his other threat in that comment.
4. Where is the irony?